 |
||||||||||||||
Book Chapters Gary Edmond & David Hamer, ‘Bacon’s chickens: Empirical studies of evidence law’ in P. Cane & H. Kritzer (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Empirical Legal Studies (2010) (forthcoming). G. Edmond, ‘Pathological science? Demonstrable reliability and expert pathology evidence’ in K. Roach (ed.), Pediatric forensic pathology and the justice system (Toronto, Queen’s Printer for Ontario, 2008) 96-149. Gary Edmond, ‘Judging facts: Managing expert knowledges in legal decision-making’ in G. Edmond (ed.), Expertise in regulation and law (Ashgate, Aldershot, 2004) 136-165.
Refereed Articles Gary Edmond & David Mercer, ‘Norms and Irony in the biosciences: Ameliorating critique in synthetic biology’ (2009) 21 Law & Literature (forthcoming). Gary Edmond, K. Biber, R. Kemp & G. Porter, ‘Law’s looking glass: Expert identification evidence derived from photographic and video images’ (2009) 20 Current Issues in Criminal Justice 337-377. Gary Edmond & M. San Roque, ‘Quasi-Justice: Ad hoc experts and identification evidence’ (2009) 32 Criminal Law Journal 8-33. Gary Edmond, ‘Merton and the hot tub: Scientific conventions and expert evidence in Australian civil procedure’ (2009) 72 Law & Contemporary Problems 159-189. Gary Edmond, ‘Judging the scientific and medical literature: Some legal implications of changes to biomedical research and publication’ (2008) 28 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 523-561. Gary Edmond, ‘Specialised knowledge, the exclusionary discretions and reliability: Reassessing incriminating expert opinion evidence’ (2008) 31 UNSW Law Journal 1-55 Gary Edmond, ‘Secrets of the “hot tub”: Expert witnesses, concurrent evidence and judge-led law reform in Australia’ (2008) 27 Civil Justice Quarterly 51-82. Gary Edmond, ‘Expert Evidence’, in Oxford Companion to Law (Oxford, Oxford University Press 2008). Gary Edmond, ‘Supersizing Daubert: Science for litigation and its implications for legal practice and scientific research’ (2007) 52 Villanova Law Review 857-924. Gary Edmond and David Mercer, ‘Anti-Social Epistemologies’ (2006) 36 Social Studies of Science 843-853. Gary Edmond, ‘Disorder with law: The determination of the geographical indication for the Coonawarra wine region’ (2006) 28 Adelaide Law Review 59-183. Gary Edmond, 'Judging Surveys: Experts, Empirical Evidence and Law Reform' (2005)33 Federal Law Review 95-139.Gary Edmond, ‘Thick decisions: Expertise, Advocacy and reasonableness in the Federal Court of Australia’ (2004) 74 Oceania 190-230. Gary Edmond, ‘After objectivity: Expert evidence and procedural reform' (2003) 25 Sydney Law Review 131-163. Gary Edmond, ‘Whigs in Court: Historiographical Problems with Expert Evidence’ (2002) 14 Yale Journal of Law and the Humanities 123-175. Gary Edmond, ‘Legal Engineering: Contested representations of law, science (and non-science) and society’ (2002) 32 Social Studies of Science 371-412. Gary Edmond, ‘Constructing miscarriages of justice: Misunderstanding the role of scientific evidence in high profile criminal appeals’ (2002) 22 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 53-89. Gary Edmond, ‘The law-set: The legal-scientific production of medical propriety’ (2001) 26 Science, Technology & Human Values 191-226. Gary Edmond, ‘Judicial representations of scientific evidence’ (2000) 63 Modern Law Review 216-251. Gary Edmond, ‘Deflating Daubert: Kumho Tire Co. v Carmichael and the inevitability of general acceptance (Frye)’ (2000) 23 University of New South Wales Law Journal 38-62. Gary Edmond, ‘Science, Law and Narrative: Helping the ‘facts’ to speak for themselves’ (1999) 23 Southern Illinois University Law Review 555-583. Gary Edmond, ‘Azaria’s Accessories: The Social (legal-scientific) Construction of Guilt and innocence’ (1998) 22 Melbourne University Law Review 396-441. Gary Edmond, ‘Science in Court: Negotiating the meaning of a ‘scientific’ experiment during a murder trial and some limits to legal deconstruction for the public understanding of law and science’ (1998) 20 Sydney Law Review 361-401. Gary Edmond, ‘Down by Science: Lay Responses to Incriminating Scientific Evidence During a Murder Trial’ (1998) 7 Public Understanding of Science 83-111. Gary Edmond, ‘The Next Step or Moonwalking? Expert Evidence, the Public Understanding of Science and the Case Against Imwinkelried’s Didactic Trial Procedures’ (1998) 2 International Journal of Evidence and Proof 13-31. Gary Edmond, ‘The Freedom of Histories: Reassessing Hugo Grotius on the law of the Sea’ (1995) 2 Law/Text/Culture 179-217. Gary Edmond & David Mercer, ‘Daubert and the exclusionary ethos: The convergence of corporate and judicial attitudes towards the admissibility of expert evidence in tort litigation’ (2004) 26 Law & Policy 231-257. Gary Edmond & David Mercer, ‘Conjectures and Exhumations: Citations of history, philosophy and sociology of science in US federal courts’ (2002) 14 Law & Literature 309-366. Gary Edmond & David Mercer, ‘Litigation Life: Law-science knowledge construction in (Bendectin) mass toxic tort litigation’ (2000) 30 Social Studies of Science 265-316. Gary Edmond & David Mercer, ‘Creating Science: Science, Law and Religion in the Australian Noah’s Ark Case’ (1999) 8 Public Understanding of Science September 317-343. Gary Edmond & David Mercer, ‘Trashing “Junk” Science’, Stanford Technology Law Review (1998). Gary Edmond & David Mercer, ‘Representing Law and the Sociology of Scientific Knowledge’ (1998) 19 Science Communication 307-327. Gary Edmond & David Mercer, ‘Scientific Literacy and the Jury’ (1997) 6 Public Understanding of Science 329-359. Gary Edmond & David Mercer, ‘The Secret Life of (Mass) Torts’ (1997) 20 University of New South Wales Law Journal 666-706. Gary Edmond & David Mercer, ‘Keeping ‘Junk’ History, Philosophy and Sociology of Science out of the Courtroom: Problems with the Reception of Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.’ (1997) 20 University of New South Wales Law Journal 48-100. Gary Edmond & David Mercer, ‘Recognising Daubert: What Judges Should Know About Falsificationism’ 5(1997) Expert Evidence 28-40. Essay Reviews Gary Edmond & David Mercer, ‘Juggling science: From polemic to pastiche’ (1999) 13 Social Epistemology 215-233. Gary Edmond & David Mercer, ‘Manifest Destiny: Law and Science in America’ (1996) 10 Metascience 40-58. Book Reviews Gary Edmond, ‘Review: H. Reece (ed.) Law and Science: Current Legal Issues (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1998)’ (2000) 4 International Journal of Evidence and Proof 137-143. Non-Refereed Gary Edmond, ‘Beyond Good and Evil: Ideal Images of Science in the Law’, Judicial Officers Bulletin 9 (September 1997) 59-60; reprinted in the Law Society Journal November 35 (1997) 63-65. |
